• Nem Talált Eredményt

Implicite Differentation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Implicite Differentation"

Copied!
34
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Implicite Differentation

(2)

Implicit Differentiation

So far, all the equations and functions we looked at were all stated explicitly in terms of one variable:

In this function, y is defined explicitly in terms of x.

If we re-wrote it as xy = 1, y is now defined implicitly in terms of x.

It is easy to find the derivative of an explicit function, but what about:

5 3 

x

y

s 16t2 30t

y  1 x

5 3

4

3

2

 

y y y

x

(3)

Explicite and implicite definition of a function

= () an explicite (usual)definition of a real function .

( , ) = 0, �h��� ( , ) ×is animplicite definition of a functionbetween .

= 1

1 , 1

�� 1 =0, 1

(4)

• Some other examples of implicit functions are:

(Equation 1) x2 + y2 = 25

(Equation 2) x3 + y3 = 6xy IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

In some cases (Eq. 1.), it is possible to solve such an equation for y as an explicit function (or several functions) of x.

 For instance, if we solve Equation 1 for y, we get

 So, two of the functions determined by the implicit Equation 1 are

and

25 2

y   x

( ) 25 2

g x   x f x( ) 25 x2

(5)

This is not a function, but it would still be nice to be able to find the slope.

Do the same thing to both sides.

Note use of chain rule.

2 2

1

xy

2 2

1

d d d

x y

dxdxdx 2 2 dy 0

x y

dx  2 dy 2

y x

dx  

2 2

dy x

dx y

 

dy x

dx   y

(6)

The graphs of f and g are the upper

and lower semicircles of the circle

x

2

+ y

2

= 25.

(7)

It’s not easy to solve Equation 2 for y explicitly as a function of x by hand.

 A computer algebra system has no trouble.

 However, the expressions it obtains are very complicated.

(8)

Nonetheless, Equation 2 is the equation of a curve called the folium of Descartes shown here and it implicitly defines y as several functions of x.

FOLIUM OF DESCARTES

(9)

The graphs of three functions defined by the folium of Descartes are shown.

FOLIUM OF DESCARTES

(10)

When we say that f is a function defined implicitly by Equation 2, we mean that the equation x3 + [f(x)]3 = 6x f(x) is true for all values of x in the domain of f.

Fortunately, we don’t need to solve an equation for y in terms of x to find the derivative of y.

Instead, we can use the method of implicit differentiation.

 This consists of differentiating both sides of

the equation with respect to x and then solving the resulting equation for y’.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

(11)

In the examples, it is always assumed that the given equation determines y implicitly as a differentiable function of x so that the method of implicit

differentiation can be applied.

Example 1

a. If x2 + y2 = 25, find .

b. Find an equation of the tangent to the circle x2 + y2 = 25 at the point (3, 4).

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

dy dx

(12)

Differentiate both sides of the equation x

2

+ y

2

= 25:

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 1 a

2 2

2 2

( ) (25)

( ) ( ) 0

d d

x y

dx dx

d d

x y

dx dx

 

 

(13)

Remembering that y is a function of x and using the Chain Rule, we have:

Then, we solve this equation for :

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 1 a

2 2

( ) ( ) 2

2 2 0

d d dy dy

y y y

dx dy dx dx

x y dy

dx

 

 

dy dx

dy x

dx   y

(14)

At the point (3, 4) we have x = 3 and y = 4.

So,

 Thus, an equation of the tangent to the circle at (3, 4) is: y – 4 = – ¾(x – 3) or 3x + 4y = 25.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION E. g. 1 b—Solution 1

3 4 dy

dx  

(15)

Solving the equation x

2

+ y

2

= 25, we get:

 The point (3, 4) lies on the upper semicircle

 So, we consider the function IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

E. g. 1 b—Solution 2

25

2

y    x

25 2

y   x

( ) 25

2

f x   x

(16)

Differentiating f using the Chain Rule, we have:

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION E. g. 1 b—Solution 2

2 1/ 2 2

1 2

2 1/ 2 1

2

2

'( ) (25 ) (25 )

(25 ) ( 2 )

25

f x x d x

dx

x x

x

x

  

  

  

(17)

So,

 As in Solution 1, an equation of the tangent is 3x + 4y = 25.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

E. g. 1 b—Solution 2

2

3 3

'(3) 25 3 4

f    

(18)

The expression dy/dx = -x/y in Solution 1 gives the derivative in terms of both x and y.

It is correct no matter which function y is determined by the given equation.

NOTE 1

For instance, for , we have:

However, for , we have:

( ) 25 2

yg x    x

2 2

25 25

dy x x x

dx     y xx

  

( ) 25 2

y f x x

25 2

dy x x

dx    y x

(19)

a. Find y’ if x3 + y3 = 6xy.

b. Find the tangent to the folium of Descartes x3 + y3 = 6xy at the point (3, 3).

c. At what points in the first quadrant is the tangent line horizontal?

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

Example 2

(20)

Differentiating both sides of x3 + y3 = 6xy with respect to x, regarding y as a function of x, and using the Chain Rule on y3 and the Product Rule on 6xy, we get:

3x2 + 3y2y’ = 6xy’ + 6y or x2 + y2y’ = 2xy’ + 2y IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

Example 2 a

(21)

Now, we solve for y’:

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 2 a

2 2

2 2

2 2

' 2 ' 2 ( 2 ) ' 2

' 2

2 y y xy y x

y x y y x

y y x

y x

  

  

 

(22)

When x = y = 3,

 A glance at the figure confirms that this is a reasonable value for the slope at (3, 3).

 So, an equation of the tangent to the folium at (3, 3) is:

y – 3 = – 1(x – 3) or x + y = 6.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

Example 2 b

2 2

2 3 3

' 1

3 2 3

y     

 

(23)

The tangent line is horizontal if y’ = 0.

 Using the expression for y’ from (a), we see that y’ = 0 when 2y – x2 = 0 (provided that y2 – 2x ≠ 0).

 Substituting y = ½x2 in the equation of the curve, we get x3 + (½x2)3 = 6x(½x2) which simplifies to x6 = 16x3.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

Example 2 c

(24)

Since x ≠ 0 in the first quadrant, we have x

3

= 16.

If x = 16

1/3

= 2

4/3

, then y = ½(2

8/3

) = 2

5/3

.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 2 c

Thus, the tangent is horizontal at (0, 0)

and at (24/3, 25/3), which is approximately (2.5198, 3.1748).

 Looking at the figure, we see that our answer is reasonable.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

(25)

There is a formula for the three roots of a cubic equation that is like the quadratic formula, but much more complicated.

If we use this formula (or a computer algebra system) to solve the equation x3 + y3 = 6xy for y in terms of x, we get three functions determined by the following equation.

NOTE 2

and

(26)

These are the three functions whose graphs are shown in the earlier figure.

NOTE 2

(27)

You can see that the method of implicit differentiation saves an enormous amount of work in cases such as this.

Moreover, implicit differentiation works just as easily for equations such as y5 + 3x2y2 + 5x4 = 12

for which it is impossible to find a similar expression for y in terms of x.

NOTE 2

(28)

Find y’ if sin(x + y) = y2 cos x.

 Differentiating implicitly with respect to x and remembering that y is a function of x, we get:

 Note that we have used the Chain Rule on the left side and the Product Rule and Chain Rule on the right side.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 3

cos( x y  ) (1   y ')  y

2

( sin ) (cos )(2  xx yy ')

(29)

If we collect the terms that involve y’, we get:

So,

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 3

cos( x y  )  y

2

sin x  (2 cos ) ' cos( y x yx y y  )  '

2

sin cos( )

' 2 cos cos( )

y x x y

y y x x y

 

  

(30)

The figure, drawn with the implicit-plotting command of a computer algebra system, shows part of the curve sin(x + y) = y2 cos x.

 As a check on our calculation, notice that y’ = -1 when

x = y = 0 and it appears that the slope is approximately -1 at the origin.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 3

(31)

Find y” if x4 + y4 = 16.

 Differentiating the equation implicitly with respect to x, we get 4x

3

+ 4y

3

y’ = 0.

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION

Example 4

The following example shows how to find the second derivative of a function that is defined implicitly.

(32)

Solving for y’ gives:

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION E. g. 4—Equation 3

To find y’’, we differentiate this expression

for y’ using the Quotient Rule and remembering that y is a function of x:

3

' x

3

y   y

3 3 3 3 3

3 3 2

3 2 3 2

6

( / )( ) ( / )( )

'' ( )

3 (3 ')

d x y d dx x x d dx y

y dx y y

y x x y y y

  

     

 

 

 

(33)

If we now substitute Equation 3 into this expression, we get:

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 4

2 3 3 2 3

3 6

2 4 6 2 4 4

7 7

3 3

''

3( ) 3 ( )

x y x y x y y

y

x y x x y x

y y

 

   

 

 

 

   

(34)

However, the values of x and y must satisfy the original equation x

4

+ y

4

= 16.

So, the answer simplifies to:

IMPLICIT DIFFERENTIATION Example 4

2 2

7 7

3 (16)

'' x 48 x

y   y   y

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

The decision on which direction to take lies entirely on the researcher, though it may be strongly influenced by the other components of the research project, such as the

In the history of rhetoric, the categories underlying the umbrella term litotes have included three different interpretations: (1) mitigation or reduction without negation, (2) a

for the boundary curve (called contact curve) of the processed part which is the curve of intersection of the ball end and the offset surface, where Off (f, ε, x, y) is the offset

In [2] we gaves some connections between fundamental solution (xo,yo) of the Pell's equation and represen- tation of 2 X 2 integral matrix as a product of powers of the prime elements

K údel ˇ cíková , Two classes of positive solutions of first order functional differential equations of delayed type, Nonlinear Anal.. M edina , Exact asymptotics of positive

In two very nice papers Baculíková and Džurina studied the oscillatory and asymptotic behavior of solutions of some third order nonlinear delay differential

As a consequence of ap- plication of the results for system (A) the class of nonoscillatory solutions x of equation (E) is divided systematically into several subclasses according

We need the following theorem from the theory of lower bounds on linear forms in logarithms of algebraic numbers... The