• Nem Talált Eredményt

Travel craving

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "Travel craving"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

Research note

Travel craving

Ariel Zoltán Mitev, Anna Irimiás ⁎

Corvinus University of Budapest, Fővám tér 8, Budapest H-1093, Hungary

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:

Received 21 June 2020

Received in revised form 20 October 2020 Accepted 22 October 2020

Available online 3 December 2020 Associate editor: Wolff Katharina

Keywords:

Travel craving Lockdowns

Cognitive-emotional events Cross-cultural analysis

Introduction

Tourists have not been able to travel during the lockdowns imposed to contain the spread of COVID-19. This unprecedented confinement has put travel in a new perspective, representing, for some at least, an intense desire which cannot be fulfilled. It seems that the effects of travel deprivation can be likened to the cognitive and emotional states experienced by behaviour addicts undergoing conditioned withdrawal (Savci & Griffiths, 2019). Travel is not an addiction, although expectations of travel and people's desire to modify current cognitive experiences make the concept of travel craving useful to understand individuals' sub- jective states. It is important to investigate the phenomenon of travel craving because the construct can potentially be applied in tourism studies to explore any situation in which travel is impossible.

Pearce and Packer (2013)called for the study of the psychological, cognitive and mental processes that underlie tourists' mo- tivations and travel intentions. Sporadic attempts have been made to investigate some travel-related addictive behaviour, specif- ically excessiveflying (Cohen et al., 2011), but the application of the behavioural addiction framework has been criticized by Young et al. (2014), andGriffiths (2017). The contribution of this research note is to conceptualise the travel craving phenome- non, to advocate the concept as a measurable construct in tourism, and to assess its relevance in an empirical cross-cultural study.

Travel craving: concept definition

In clinical psychology,‘craving’is used across a spectrum of meaning, from an extreme liking for, to the compulsory use of a substance (Kavanagh et al., 2013;Flannery et al., 1999). Craving has been (narrowly) defined as a‘very strong desire for a psy- choactive substance’(WHO, 2020).Kavanagh et al. (2013:1572)broadened the concept, stating it to be‘a cognitive-emotional event in time’, describable in terms of duration and frequency. A craving can have an object other than a substance and should

Annals of Tourism Research 90 (2021) 103111

Corresponding author.

E-mail addresses:ariel.mitev@uni-corvinus.hu, (A.Z. Mitev),anna.irimias@uni-corvinus.hu. (A. Irimiás).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103111

0160-7383/© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc- nd/4.0/).

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Annals of Tourism Research

j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e :h t t p s : / / w w w . j o u r n a l s . e l s e v i e r . c o m / a n n a l s - o f - t o u r i s m - r e s e a r c h

(2)

not be confused with its consequences or causes.Toneatto (1999:529)argued that a craving is a‘strong desire to modify ongoing cognitive experiences’and does not relate only to addictions. In periods of abstinence, a craving, prior to initiating the necessary behaviour to assuage it, can lead to discomfort. To stimulate the scientific investigation of travel craving we propose a definition:

Travel craving is a travel focused cognitive-emotional event with aversive or incentive properties experienced when a person who wishes to travel cannot do so, for reasons beyond their control.

Cognitive events are subjective mental experiences such as discursive thinking, memories, feelings, dreams and mental images (Kavanagh et al., 2013;Toneatto, 1999). In tourism, mental images of anticipated memories and memorable experiences have been acknowledged to influence pre-trip expectations (Wood, 2019).‘Craving’, if taken to mean the anticipation of an experience, can alleviate the distress caused by the‘unpleasant conditioned withdrawal experience’(Drummond, 2001:36). Travel craving in- volves affect, sensory experiences of other - mostly pleasurable - cognitive events, experienced at a range of intensities. In order to clearly define the construct and ensure the systematic development of knowledge about it, it is important to define what travel craving is not. Firstly, it is not the same as travel intention: intentions may manifest even when a craving is not particularly in- tense. Craving does not depend on travel frequency, because travel craving and travel consumption are distinct phenomena. How the concept is defined has implications for its assessment: by investigating how strong and/or how frequent a craving is, and how long it lasts, we can assess the construct without asking directly about its aversive or incentive properties. This is crucial to minimising any response bias that a researcher's preconceived ideas about craving might introduce (Kavanagh et al., 2013).

Methodology

We conducted a cross-cultural survey to assess the cognitive and emotional event of (travel) craving.

Convenience sample

The participants were students at Trento University (Italy) and the Corvinus University of Budapest (Hungary), recruited via an email containing the survey's web-link. Of the 627 responses collected, those from international students (n = 32) and incom- plete surveys (n = 60) were eliminated from the analysis, giving a sample of 535 (73.1% female;Mage= 22.74; SD 1.98; Italian 62.2%, Hungarian 37.8%). Although restrictive measures were imposed in both countries, the contexts were slightly different.

Italy's lockdown prohibited all outdoor activities, while in Hungary certain outdoor activities were permitted.

Research instrument

A structured online survey in English was used to collect data. To avoid the risk of lack of scale validity and to ensure reliabil- ity, the survey was tested in a pilot study (n = 20), confirming that the questions were unambiguous and understood by the par- ticipants (Dolnicar, 2018). The pilot study took place on Microsoft Teams.

Data collection

Data was gathered in a crucial period. In the last two weeks of the lockdown (22nd May–7th June 2020) restrictive measures were easing, and governments announced new travel rules. Data gathering started a week after the pilot study. Survey completion time was 10 min, and respondent fatigue minimal.

Table 1

Scale adaptation, measurement items (n = 535).

Item Original PACS Travel craving Mean SD Skewness Kurtosis

1 How often have you thought about drinking, or how good a drink would make you feel?

How often have you thought abouttravel, or how goodtravel would make you feel? (1 = never; 7 = nearly all of the time)

5.09 1.472 −0.671 0.037 2 At its most severe point, how strong was

your craving for alcohol?

At its most severe point, how strong was your craving fortravel?

(1 = none at all; 7 = very strong)

4.94 1.633 −0.559 −0.451 3 How much time have you spent thinking

about drinking or how good a drink would make you feel?

How much time have you spent thinking abouttravellingor how goodtravelwould make you feel? (1 = none at all; 7 = huge amount of time)

4.60 1.620 −0.272 −0.690

4 How difficult would it have been to resist a drink if you had known a bottle were in your house?

How difficultwas it to resist travelling? (1 = not difficult at all;

7 = extremely difficult)

3.35 1.798 0.413 −0.859

5 Keeping in mind your response to the previous questions please rate your overall alcohol craving?

Please rate your overalltravelcraving? (1 = I was not craving it at all, 7 = I was craving it very much)

4.44 1.594 −0.225 −0.633

Total Total 22.43 6.799 −0.306 −0.413

A.Z. Mitev and A. Irimiás Annals of Tourism Research 90 (2021) 103111

2

(3)

Scale adaptation

We adapted the multi-item, single-factor Penn Alcohol-Craving Scale (PACS) devised byFlannery et al. (1999). The PACS scale is practical and has been adapted to other behaviours (Savci & Griffiths, 2019). The different items measure different components of craving: frequency, duration, intensity, the person's ability to resist.

Results

To explore the psychological effects of the impossibility of travelling and the extent of travel craving, the PACS was adapted to the context of tourism. The adaptations [in bold] and descriptive statistics are shown inTable 1.

We kept item 4, although the apparent lack of equivalence, because booking websites stayed active under lockdowns bringing apparently close the opportunity to travel. An exploratory factor analysis was carried out, and thetravel craving scalewas found to be single-factor; the unidimensional structure explained 71% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the travel craving model has a goodfit (χ2/df = 10.355/4,p= 0.035; CFI = 0.996; TLI = 0.990; RMSEA = 0.055).

The correlations between travel craving and the ability to cope with the absence of other activities are shown inTable 2. Note that all of the activities listed were prohibited during the lockdowns. Convergent validity for travel craving was evidenced by the strong correlation with difficulty in coping with the travel bans. Discriminant validity was also confirmed by the ease with which participants coped with not being able to attend university in person. The analysis thus demonstrates that travel craving was as- sociated with all these variables in the expected direction.

Measurement invariance

In the cross-cultural sample internal consistency is high (Cronbach'sα(αTOTAL= 0.892;αIT= 0.905;αHUN= 0.866)). Invari- ance measurement is key to drawing valid conclusions on cross-cultural generalizability. Items were evaluated with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis and all factor loadings had a goodfit (Table 3).

The configural model, the metric model, and the scalar model were tested and compared throughΔCFI tests (Table 4). All in- dices indicated an excellentfit cross-nationally. In fact, thetravel craving scalewas invariant, providing similar dimensionality and consistent factor structure across countries.

Conclusions

The pandemic and the consequent restrictions have changed how we think about travel. This research note provides insights into the psychological aspects of travel-deprivation and enriches the tourism literature by conceptualising travel craving as a con- text specific construct which can be applied in any situation in which people are unable to travel, whether for personal economic or health reasons, or because of externally imposed restrictions on movement. We argue that travel craving is not a precursor of actual travel, but a cognitive-emotional event in time focused on travel as a way to alleviate the unpleasant/aversive condition of Table 2

Correlation between travel craving and other variables.

In the past three months, how did you cope without the following (1 = I really missed it, 7 = I was perfectly fine without it)

Travel craving (total) Full

sample Italian sample

Hungarian sample

Going to concerts and festivals −0.246⁎⁎ −0.305⁎⁎ −0.102

Attending university −0.067 −0.90 −0.089

Travelling −0.685⁎⁎ −0.745⁎⁎ −0.573⁎⁎

Being on vacation −0.474⁎⁎ −0.502⁎⁎ −0.403⁎⁎

⁎⁎Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Table 3

Measurement analysis results: parameter estimates.

Item Italian sample Hungarian sample

Standardized estimates t-Value Standardized estimates t-Value

I1 0.787 0.716

I2 0.832 16.42 0.764 9.83

I3 0.796 19.88 0.777 10.51

I4 0.698 13.25 0.626 8.17

I5 0.912 17.96 0.862 10.66

Note: Covariances between e1 and e3 are allowed.

A.Z. Mitev and A. Irimiás Annals of Tourism Research 90 (2021) 103111

3

(4)

lockdowns. This study responds toPearce and Packer's (2013)recommendation to develop appropriate concepts with which to explore individuals' mental processes and travel related sensory experiences. It indicates that the travel craving scale was invari- ant across countries with a unidimensional goodfit multi-item scale. The study has some limitations: the adapted scale measured self-reported data only representing a snapshot of this phenomenon under lockdowns; and no other scales were used to test con- vergent and discriminant validity. Any future studies should use larger, probabilistic samples that include different age cohorts.

Declaration of competing interest None.

References

Cohen, S., Higham, J., & Cavaliere, C. (2011).Binge flying: Behavioural addiction and climate change.Annals of Tourism Research,38(3), 1070–1089.

Dolnicar, S. (2018).A reflection on survey research in hospitality.International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,30(1), 3412–3422.

Drummond, D. C. (2001).Theories of drug craving, ancient and modern.Addiction,96, 33–46.

Flannery, B. A., Volpicelli, J. R., & Pettinati, H. M. (1999).Psychometric properties of the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale.Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research,23(8), 1289–1295.

Griffiths, M. D. (2017).A brief critique of 'flying addiction'.Global Journal of Addiction and Rehabilitation Medicine,3(1), Article 555602.

Kavanagh, D., Statham, D. J., Feeney, G. F. X., Young, R., May, J., Andrade, J., & Connor, J. (2013).Measurement of alcohol craving.Addictive Behaviours,38(2), 1572–1584.

Pearce, P. L., & Packer, J. (2013).Minds on the move: New links from psychology to tourism.Annals of Tourism Research,40, 386–414.

Savci, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). The development of the Turkish Social Media Craving Scale (SMCS): A validation study.International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00062-9.

Toneatto, T. (1999).A metacognitive analysis of craving: Implications for treatment.Journal of Clinical Psychology,55(5), 527–537.

Wood, E. (2019). I remember how we all felt: Perceived emotional synchrony through tourist memory sharing.Journal of Travel Research.https://doi.org/10.1177/

0047287519888290.

World Health Organization (2020). Management of substance abuse.https://www.who.int/substance_abuse/terminology/who_lexicon/en/.

Young, M., Higham, J. E. S., & Reis, A. C. (2014).“Up in the air”: A conceptual critique of flying addiction.Annals of Tourism Research,49, 51–64.

Ariel Zoltán Mitevhas been an Associate Professor in Marketing at Corvinus University of Budapest since 2006. He received the Excellent Mentor Award in 2019. Ariel's interests include marketing research methodology, scale development, consumer behaviour and tourism.

Anna Irimiáshas been an Associate Professor at the Tourism Department of the Corvinus University of Budapest (Hungary). Anna's current research interests include consumer behaviour, tourism destination management, cultural tourism,film induced tourism.

Table 4

Assessment of measurement invariance.

Model specification χ2/df p RMSEA CFI ΔCFI TLI

configural invariance 14.752/8 0.064 0.040 0.996 0.989

metric invariance 16.897/12 0.154 0.028 0.997 0.001 0.995

scalar invariance 31.333/17 0.018 0.040 0.991 0.006 0.989

Note: df = degree of freedom; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; CFI = comparativefit index, TLI = Tucker–Lewis index,ΔCFI0.01 indicates factorial invariance.

A.Z. Mitev and A. Irimiás Annals of Tourism Research 90 (2021) 103111

4

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

Your desire for such educational standards as improved conditions of study, free access to unbiased information and freedom to travel wherever one wishes is greatly

When arriving at CEU’s campus, bikers will have the option of securing their bikes to one of the 15 street level racks (Figure 17) which are currently installed on Zrinyi Street,

travel demand management · travel behavior · sustainable transport systems · urban mobility planning..

The origin-destination travel time and distance were used for visualization of shortening of travel time of air passenger trans- port (Table 2).. The travel time presents the

3 Travel time gear to travel distance in case of parallel public transport service using high-speed buses (source: own

The vehicle is assuilled to travel throughout in state 2, h, an assumption involved first in the determination of the expected numher of level intersections

longer travel time due to congestion would increase total emissions (e) whereas longer travel times due to detours in areas with low background pollutants would not increase

We consider the case when the two regions are symmetric in the population sizes and values of every model parameter, but have different local reproduction numbers, and we assume that