• Nem Talált Eredményt

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "JJ II"

Copied!
22
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

volume 7, issue 1, article 20, 2006.

Received 16 May, 2005;

accepted 02 October, 2005.

Communicated by:G. Kohr

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close Quit

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

SUBORDINATION RESULTS FOR THE FAMILY OF UNIFORMLY CONVEXp−VALENT FUNCTIONS

H.A. AL-KHARSANI AND S.S. AL-HAJIRY

Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science Girls College, Dammam Saudi Arabia.

EMail:ssmh1@hotmail.com

c

2000Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 151-05

(2)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Abstract

The object of the present paper is to introduce a class ofp−valent uniformly functionsUCVp. We deduce a criteria for functions to lie in the classUCVpand derive several interesting properties such as distortion inequalities and coeffi- cients estimates. We confirm our results using the Mathematica program by drawing diagrams of extremal functions of this class.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:30C45.

Key words:p−valent, Uniformly convex functions, Subordination.

We express our thanks to Dr.M.K.Aouf for his helpful comments.

Contents

1 Introduction. . . 3

2 The ClassP ARp. . . 4

3 Characterization ofU CVp . . . 6

4 Subordination Theorem and Consequences . . . 9

5 General Properties of Functions inU CVp . . . 15

5.1 Remarks . . . 21 References

(3)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

1. Introduction

Denote byA(p, n)the class of normalized functions

(1.1) f(z) = zp+

X

k=2

ak+p−1zk+p−1

regular in the unit disk D = {z : |z| < 1} and p ∈ N, consider also its subclasses C(p), S(p) consisting of p−valent convex and starlike functions respectively, whereC(1)≡C,S(1)≡S, the classes of univalent convex and starlike functions .

It is well known that for any f ∈ C, not only f(D) but the images of all circles centered at 0 and lying inDare convex arcs. B. Pinchuk posed a question whether this property is still valid for circles centered at other points ofD. A.W.

Goodman [1] gave a negative answer to this question and introduced the class U CV of univalent uniformly convex functions, f ∈ C such that any circular arc γ lying in D, having the center ζ ∈ D is carried byf into a convex arc.

A.W.Goodman [1] stated the criterion (1.2) Re

1 + (z−ζ)f00(z) f0(z)

>0, ∀z, ζ ∈D⇐⇒f ∈U CV.

Later F. Ronning (and independently W. Ma and D. Minda) [7] obtained a more suitable form of the criterion , namely

(1.3) Re

1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

>

zf00(z) f0(z)

, ∀z ∈D⇐⇒f ∈U CV.

This criterion was used to find some sharp coefficients estimates and distor- tion theorems for functions in the classU CV.

(4)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

2

3 4 5

6

-2 0

2 4

-1 -

0 1

2

3 4 5

6

2. The Class P AR

p

We now introduce a subfamilyP ARp ofP. Let Ω =

w=µ+iυ : υ2

p <2µ−p (2.1)

={w: Rew >|w−p|}.

(2.2)

Note that Ω is the interior of a parabola in the right half-plane which is symmetric about the real axis and has vertex at(p/2,0). The following diagram shows Ωwhenp= 3:

Let

(2.3) P ARp ={h ∈p:h(D)⊆Ω}.

(5)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

Example 2.1. It is known thatz =−tan2 π

2 2p

√w

maps

w=µ+iν : ν2

p < p−2µ

conformally onto D. Hence,z = −tan2 π

2 2p

√p−w

mapsconformally ontoD. Letw = Q(z)be the inverse function. ThenQ(z)is a Riemann map- ping function fromDtowhich satisfiesQ(0) =p; more explicitly,

Q(z) = p+2p π2

log

1 +√ z 1−√

z 2

=

X

n=0

Bnzn (2.4)

=p+8p

π2z+16p

2z2+ 184p

45π2z3+· · · (2.5)

Obviously,Q(z)belongs to the classP ARp.Geometrically,P ARp consists of those holomorphic functionsh(z) (h(0) =p)defined onDwhich are subor- dinate toQ(z), writtenh(z)≺Q(z).

The analytic characterization of the class P ARp is shown in the following relation:

(2.6) h(z)∈P ARp ⇔Re{h(z)} ≥ |h(z)−p|

such thath(z)is ap−valent analytic function onD.

Now, we can derive the following definition.

Definition 2.1. Let f(z) ∈ A(p, n).Then f(z) ∈ U CVp iff(z) ∈ C(p) and 1 +zff000(z)(z) ∈P ARp.

(6)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

3. Characterization of U CV

p

We present the nessesary and sufficient condition to belong to the classU CVp in the following theorem:

Theorem 3.1. Letf(z)∈A(p, n).Then

(3.1) f(z)∈U CVp ⇔1 + Re

zf00(z) f0(z)

zf00(z)

f0(z) −(p−1)

, z ∈D.

Proof. Letf(z) ∈ U CVp andh(z) = 1 +zff000(z)(z). Thenh(z) ∈ P ARp, that is, Re{h(z)} ≥ |h(z)−p|. Then

Re

1 +zf00(z) f0(z)

zf00(z)

f0(z) −(p−1) .

Example 3.1. We now specify a holomorphic functionK(z)inDby

(3.2) 1 +zK00(z)

K0(z) =Q(z),

where Q(z)is the conformal mapping ontogiven in Example2.1. Then it is clear from Theorem3.1thatK(z)is inU CVp.

Let

(3.3) K(z) =zp+

X

k=2

Akzk+p−1.

(7)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page7of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

From the relationship between the functionsQ(z)andK(z), we obtain

(3.4) (p+n−1)(n−1)An =

n−1

X

k=1

(k+p−1)AkBn−k.

Since all the coefficientsBnare positive, it follows that all of the coefficientsAn are also positive. In particular,

(3.5) A2 = 8p2

π2(p+ 1), and

(3.6) A3 = p2

2(p+ 2) 16

2 + 64p π4

.

Note that

(3.7) log k0(z)

zp−1 = Z z

0

Q(ς)−p ς dς.

By computing some coefficients of K(z) when p = 3, we can obtain the following diagram

(8)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page8of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

-2 -1

0 1

2

-2 0

2

-1 -0.5

0 0.5

1

-2 -1

0 1

2

(9)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page9of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

4. Subordination Theorem and Consequences

In this section, we first derive some subordination results from Theorem4.1; as corollaries we obtain sharp distortion, growth, covering and rotation theorems from the familyU CVp.

Theorem 4.1. Assume that f(z)∈ U CVp. Then1 +zff000(z)(z) ≺1 +zKK000(z)(z) and

f0(z)

zp−1Kzp−10(z).

Proof. Let f(z)∈U CVp. Thenh(z) = 1 +zff000(z)(z) ≺1 +zKK000(z)(z) is the same as h(z) ≺Q(z). Note that Q(z)−pis a convex univalent function inD. By using a result of Goluzin, we may conclude that

(4.1) logf0(z) zp−1 =

Z z

0

h(ς)−1 ς dς ≺

Z z

0

Q(ς)−p

ς dς = logK0(z) zp−1 . Equivalently, zfp−10(z)Kzp−10(z).

Corollary 4.2 (Distortion Theorem). Assume f(z)∈U CVpand |z|=r <1.

ThenK0(−r)≤ |f0(z)| ≤K0(r).

Equality holds for somez 6= 0if and only if f(z)is a rotation ofK(z).

Proof. Since Q(z)−p is convex univalent in D, it follows that logK0(z)is also convex univalent inD. In fact, the power series forlogK0(z)has positive coefficients, so the image of Dunder this convex function is symmetric about

(10)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page10of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

the real axis. Aslog zfp−10(z) ≺logKzp−10(z), the subordination principle shows that K0(−r) = e{logK0(−r)} =e

min

|z|=rRe{logK0(z)}

(4.2)

≤e{Re logK0(z)} =|f0(z)| ≤e

max

|z|=rRe{logK0(z)}

=e{logK0(r)} =K0(r).

Note that for|z0|=r, either

Re{logf0(z0)}= min

|z|=rRe{logK0(z)}

or

Re{logf0(z0)}= max

|z|=rRe{logK0(z)}

for somez0 6= 0 if and only if logf0(z) = logK0(ez)for someθ ∈R.

Theorem 4.3. Let f(z)∈U CVp. Then

(4.3) |f0(z)| ≤

zp−1

e14pπ2ς(3) = zp−1

Lp for|z|<1.(L≈5.502, ς(t)is the Riemann Zeta function.)

Proof. Let φ(z) = zgg(z)0(z), where g(z) = zf0(z). Then φ(z) ≺ Q(z) which means thatφ(z)≺p+π2p2

log

1+ z 1−

z

.Moreover , logg(z)

zp = Z z

0

φ(s)−p s

ds

(11)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page11of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

and therefore, ifz =re and|z|= 1, log

g(z) zp

= Z r

0

<e(φ(te)−p)dt t ≤ 2p

π2 Z r

0

1 t log

1 +√ t 1−√

t

dt

≤ 2p π2

Z 1

0

1 t log

1 +√ t 1−√

t

dt= 2p

π2(7ς(3)), where

Z 1

0

1 t log

1 +√ t 1−√

t

dt = 7ς(3) [8].

Then we find that

zf0(z) zp

≤eπ2p2(7ς(3)).

The following diagram shows the boundary ofK(z)’s dervative whenp= 2 in a circle has the radius(5.5)2:

-20

0

20

-20 0

20 -0.50.5-101

-20

0

20

(12)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page12of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Corollary 4.4 (Growth Theorem). Let f(z)∈ U CVpand |z| =r <1.Then

−K(−r)≤ |f(z)| ≤K(r).

Equality holds for somez 6= 0if and only if f(z)is a rotation ofK(z).

Corollary 4.5 (Covering Theorem). Supposef(z)∈U CVp. Then eitherf(z) is a rotation ofK(z) or{w:|w| ≤ −K(−1)} ⊆f(D).

Corollary 4.6 (Rotation Theorem). Let f(z) ∈ U CVp and |z0| = r < 1.

Then

(4.4) |Arg{f0(z0)}| ≤max

|z|=rArg{K0(z).

Equality holds for somez 6= 0if and only if f(z)is a rotation ofK(z).

Theorem 4.7. Letf(z) =zp+P

k=2ak+p−1zk+p−1 andf(z)∈U CVp,and let An+p−1 = max

f(z)∈U CVp|an+p−1|. Then

(4.5) Ap+1 = 8p2

π2(p+ 1). The result is sharp. Further, we get

(4.6) An+p−1 ≤ 8p2

(n+p−1)(n−1)π2

n

Y

k=3

1 + 8p (k−2)π2

. Proof. Letf(z) =zp+P

k=2ak+p−1zk+p−1 andf(z)∈U CVp,and define φ(z) = 1 +zf00(z)

f0(z) =p+

X

k=2

ckzk+p−1.

(13)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page13of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

Then φ(z) ≺ Q(z). Q(z) is univalent inD and Q(D) is a convex region, so Rogosinski’s theorem applies.

Q(z) = p+8p

π2z+ 16p

2z2+ 184p

45π2z3+· · · ,

so we have |cn| ≤ |B1| = π8p2 :=B.Now, from the relationship between func- tionsf(z)andQ(z),we obtain

(n+p−1)(n−1)an+p−1 =

n−1

X

k=1

(k+p−1)ak+p−1cn−k.

From this we get|ap+1|= (p+1)pB = π28p(p+1)2 . If we choosef(z)to be that function for which Q(z) = 1 + zff000(z)(z),thenf(z) ∈ U CVp withap+1 = π28p(p+1)2 , which shows that this result is sharp. Now, when we put|c1|=B,then

ap+2 = papc2+ (p+ 1)ap+1c1 2(p+ 2)

|ap+2| ≤ pB(1 +Bp) 2(p+ 2) . Whenn= 3

ap+3 = papc3+ (p+ 1)ap+1c2+ (p+ 2)ap+2c1 3(p+ 3)

|ap+3| ≤ 1 2

pB(1 +Bp)(2 +Bp) 3(p+ 3)

= 1

3(p+ 3)pB(1 +Bp)

1 + Bp 2

.

(14)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page14of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

We now proceed by induction. Assume we have

|ap+n−1| ≤ 1

(n−1)(p+n−1)pB(1 +Bp)

1 + Bp 2

· · ·

1 + Bp n−2

= pB

(n−1)(p+n−1)

n

Y

k=3

1 + Bp k−2

.

Corollary 4.8. Letf(z) = zp+P

k=2ak+p−1zk+p−1 andf(z) ∈ U CVp.Then

|ap+n−1|=O n12

.

(15)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page15of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

5. General Properties of Functions in U CV

p

Theorem 5.1. Let f(z) = zp+P

k=2ak+p−1zk+p−1 andf(z) ∈ U CVp. Then f(z)is ap−valently convex function of orderβ in |z| < r1 = r1(p, β), where r1(p, β)is the largest value ofr for which

rk−1 ≤ (p−β)(k−1) (k+p−β−1)BQk

j=3

1 + j−2pB, (5.1)

(k∈N− {1}, 0≤β < p).

Proof. It is sufficient to show that forf(z)∈U CVp,

1 + zf00(z) f0(z) −p

≤p−β, |z|< r1(p, β), 0≤β < p,

wherer1(p, β)is the largest value ofrfor which the inequality (5.1) holds true.

Observe that

1 + zf00(z) f0(z) −p

=

P

k=2(k+p−1)(k−1)ak+p−1zk−1 p+P

k=2(k+p−1)ak+p−1zk−1 . Then we have

1 + zff000(z)(z)−p

≤p−β if and only if P

k=2(k+p−1)(k−1)|ak+p−1|rk−1 p−P

k=2(k+p−1)|ak+p−1|rk−1 ≤p−β

X

k=2

(k+p−1)(k+p−1−β)|ak+p−1|rk−1 ≤p2−pβ.

(16)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page16of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Then from Theorem4.7sincef(z)∈U CVp, we have

|ak+p−1| ≤ pβ

(k+p−1)(k−1)

k

Y

j=3

1 + Bp j−2

and we may set

|ak+p−1|= pβ

(k+p−1)(k−1)

k

Y

j=3

1 + Bp j−2

ck+p−1, ck+p−1 ≥0,

(

k∈N− {1},

X

k=1

ck+p−1 ≤1 )

.

Now, for each fixedr, we choose a positive integerk0 =k0(r)for which (k+p−1−β)

(k−1) rk−1 is maximal. Then

X

k=2

(k+p−1)(k+p−β−1)|ak+p−1|rk−1

≤ (k0 +p−β−1) (k0−1) rk0−1

k

Y

j=3

1 + Bp j−2

.

(17)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page17of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

Consequently, the function f(z)is ap−valently convex function of orderβ in

|z|< r1 =r1(p, β)provided that (k0+p−β−1)

(k0−1) rk0−1

k

Y

j=3

1 + Bp j −2

≤p(p−β).

We find the valuer0 =r0(p, β)and the corresponding integerk0(r0)so that (k0+p−β−1)

(k0−1) rk0−1

k

Y

j=3

1 + Bp j−2

=p(p−β), (0≤β < p).

Then this value r0 is the radius ofp−valent convexity of orderβ for functions f(z)∈U CVp.

Theorem 5.2. h(z) =zp+bn+p−1zn+p−1 is inU CVp if and only if

r≤ p2

(p+n−1)(p+ 2n−2), where|bn+p−1|=randbn+p−1zn−1 =re.

Proof. Letw(z) = 1 +zhh000(z)(z).Thenh(z)∈U CVpif and only ifw(z)∈P ARp which means thatRe{w(z)} ≥ |w(z)−p|.On the other side we have

Re

1 + zh00(z) h0(z)

1 + zh00(z) h0(z) −p

,

(18)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page18of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

then Re

1 + zh00(z) h0(z)

= Re

(p−1) + p+ (n+p−1)nre p+ (n+p−1)re

= p3+p(n+p−1)(n+ 2p−1)rcosθ+ (n+p−1)3r2

|p+ (n+p−1)re|2 . The right-hand side is seen to have a minimum forθ =πand this minimal value is p3 +p(n+p−1)(n+ 2p−1)r+ (n+p−1)3r2

|p+ (n+p−1)re|2 . Now, by computation we see that

1 + zh00(z) h0(z) −p

= (n+p−1)(n−1)r

|p+ (n+p−1)re|. Then

(n+p−1)(n−1)r≤ p3+p(n+p−1)(n+ 2p−1)r+ (n+p−1)3r2

p−(n+p−1)r ,

which leads to

(n+p−1)(n−1)r≤p2−(n+p−1)2r.

Hence,

r≤ p2

(n+p−1)(2n+p−2).

(19)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page19of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

Theorem 5.3. Letf(z)∈U CV,then(f(z))p ∈U CVp. Proof. Letw(z) = (f(z))p,then

1 +zw00(z)

w0(z) = 1 +zf00(z)

f0(z) + (p−1)zf0(z) f(z). Then we find

Re

1 +zw00(z) w0(z)

zw00(z)

w0(z) −(p−1)

= Re

1 +zf00(z)

f0(z) + (p−1)zf0(z) f(z)

zf00(z)

f0(z) + (p−1)zf0(z)

f(z) −(p−1) .

Sincef(z)∈U CV, therefore we have Re

1 +zf00(z)

f0(z) + (p−1)zf0(z) f(z)

zf00(z)

f0(z) + (p−1)zf0(z)

f(z) −(p−1)

≥(p−1)Re

zf0(z) f(z)

zf0(z) f(z) −1

f(z)∈U CV, thenf(z)∈SP [7] which means that

Re

zf0(z) f(z)

zf0(z) f(z) −1

≥0.

(20)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page20of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Then

Re

1 +zw00(z) w0(z)

zw00(z)

w0(z) −(p−1)

≥0.

The following diagram shows the extermal functionk(z)of the classU CV when(k(z))p, p= 2:

The following diagram shows the extermal functionK(z)of the classU CVp whenp= 2:

(21)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page21of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

And the following diagram shows that(k(z))p ≺K(z):

5.1. Remarks

Takingp= 1in Theorem3.1, we obtain the corresponding Theorem 1 of [7].

Taking p = 1 in Theorem4.1, we obtain the corresponding Theorem 3 of [3].

Takingp= 1in inequality (4.3), we obtain Theorem 6 of [7], and in inequal- ities (4.5), (4.6), we obtain Theorem 5 of [7].

Takingp= 1in Theorem5.2, we obtain Theorem 2 of [4].

(22)

Subordination Results for the Family of Uniformly Convex

p−valent Functions

H.A. Al-Kharsani and S.S.

Al-Hajiry

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page22of22

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 7(1) Art. 20, 2006

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

References

[1] A.W. GOODMAN, On uniformly convex functions, Ann. Polon. Math., 56(1) (1991), 87–92.

[2] S. KANAS ANDA. WISNIOWSKA, Conic regions andk-uniform convex- ity, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 105(1-2) (1999), 327–336.

[3] W.C. MA AND D. MINDA, Uniformly convex functions, Ann. Polon.

Math., 57(2) (1992), 165–175.

[4] S. OWA, On uniformly convex functions, Math. Japonica, 48(3) (1998), 377–384.

[5] M.S. ROBERTSON, On the theory of univalent functions, Ann. Math., 2(37) (1936), 347–408.

[6] F. RONNING, A survey on uniformly convex and uniformly starlike func- tions, Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sect. A, 47 (1993), 123–134.

[7] F. RONNING, Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 118(1) (1993), 189–196.

[8] F. RONNING, On uniform starlikeness and related properties of univalent functions, Complex Variables Theory Appl., 24(3-4) (1994), 233–239.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

The plan of this is as follows : in the next section we will give some preliminaries and some technical lemmas, section 3 is concerned with main results and basic assumptions,

This means that we take the first repetition of attset(e,p'), where p' is a prefix of p, beginning from the leaf at p. In fact, card{U,) &gt; 1, because M is visiting and thus

Further (for this class of functions), we obtain a subordination theorem, bound- edness properties involving partial sums, properties relating to an integral transform and some

The paper is arranged as follows: in §2, we quote some preliminaries on time scales from [1]; §3 includes our main results which generalize Lemma A and Theorem A by the means

In this section, we first derive some subordination results from Theorem 4.1; as corollaries we obtain sharp distortion, growth, covering and rotation theorems from the family U CV

In this section, we give a short list of some common functions that are monotone in both the regular majorization and variance majorization orders. And we give as corollaries

In this paper, we consider univalent log-harmonic mappings of the form f = zhg defined on the unit disk U which are starlike of order α.. Representation theorems and distortion

In this paper, we consider univalent log-harmonic mappings of the form f = zhg defined on the unit disk U which are starlike of order α.. Representation theorems and distortion