• Nem Talált Eredményt

In this paper, using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, we establish some new integral inequalities for the Chebyshev functional in the case of two synchronous functions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Ossza meg "In this paper, using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, we establish some new integral inequalities for the Chebyshev functional in the case of two synchronous functions"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teljes szövegt

(1)

ON SOME NEW FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL INEQUALITIES

SOUMIA BELARBI AND ZOUBIR DAHMANI DEPARTMENT OFMATHEMATICS,

UNIVERSITY OFMOSTAGANEM

soumia-math@hotmail.fr zzdahmani@yahoo.fr

Received 23 May, 2009; accepted 24 June, 2009 Communicated by G. Anastassiou

ABSTRACT. In this paper, using the Riemann-Liouville fractional integral, we establish some new integral inequalities for the Chebyshev functional in the case of two synchronous functions.

Key words and phrases: Fractional integral inequalities, Riemann-Liouville fractional integral.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D10, 26A33.

1. INTRODUCTION

Let us consider the functional [1]:

(1.1) T(f, g) := 1 b−a

Z b

a

f(x)g(x)dx− 1 b−a

Z b

a

f(x)dx 1 b−a

Z b

a

g(x)dx

, where f and g are two integrable functions which are synchronous on [a, b]

i.e. (f(x)− f(y))(g(x)−g(y))≥0,for anyx, y ∈[a, b]

.

Many researchers have given considerable attention to (1.1) and a number of inequalities have appeared in the literature, see [3, 4, 5].

The main purpose of this paper is to establish some inequalities for the functional (1.1) using fractional integrals.

2. DESCRIPTION OFFRACTIONALCALCULUS

We will give the necessary notation and basic definitions below. For more details, one can consult [2, 6].

Definition 2.1. A real valued functionf(t), t ≥0is said to be in the spaceCµ, µ ∈ Rif there exists a real numberp > µsuch thatf(t) = tpf1(t),wheref1(t)∈C([0,∞[).

Definition 2.2. A functionf(t), t≥0is said to be in the spaceCµn, n ∈R, iff(n) ∈Cµ.

The authors would like to thank professor A. El Farissi for his helpful.

139-09

(2)

Definition 2.3. The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral operator of orderα ≥ 0, for a func- tionf ∈Cµ,(µ≥ −1)is defined as

Jαf(t) = 1 Γ(α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1f(τ)dτ; α >0, t >0, (2.1)

J0f(t) =f(t), whereΓ(α) := R

0 e−uuα−1du.

For the convenience of establishing the results, we give the semigroup property:

(2.2) JαJβf(t) =Jα+βf(t), α ≥0, β ≥0, which implies the commutative property:

(2.3) JαJβf(t) = JβJαf(t).

From (2.1), whenf(t) =tµwe get another expression that will be used later:

(2.4) Jαtµ= Γ(µ+ 1)

Γ(α+µ+ 1)tα+µ, α >0; µ >−1, t >0.

3. MAINRESULTS

Theorem 3.1. Letf andg be two synchronous functions on[0,∞[.Then for allt > 0, α > 0, we have:

(3.1) Jα(f g)(t)≥ Γ(α+ 1)

tα Jαf(t)Jαg(t).

Proof. Since the functionsf and g are synchronous on[0,∞[, then for allτ ≥ 0, ρ ≥ 0,we have

(3.2)

f(τ)−f(ρ)

g(τ)−g(ρ)

≥0.

Therefore

(3.3) f(τ)g(τ) +f(ρ)g(ρ)≥f(τ)g(ρ) +f(ρ)g(τ).

Now, multiplying both sides of (3.3) by (t−τ)Γ(α)α−1, τ ∈(0, t),we get (3.4) (t−τ)α−1

Γ(α) f(τ)g(τ) + (t−τ)α−1

Γ(α) f(ρ)g(ρ)

≥ (t−τ)α−1

Γ(α) f(τ)g(ρ) + (t−τ)α−1

Γ(α) f(ρ)g(τ).

Then integrating (3.4) over(0, t), we obtain:

(3.5) 1 Γ(α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1f(τ)g(τ)dτ + 1 Γ(α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1f(ρ)g(ρ)dτ

≥ 1 Γ(α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1f(τ)g(ρ)dτ + 1 Γ(α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1f(ρ)g(τ)dτ.

Consequently,

(3.6) Jα(f g)(t) +f(ρ)g(ρ) 1 Γ (α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1

≥ g(ρ) Γ (α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1f(τ)dτ+ f(ρ) Γ (α)

Z t

0

(t−τ)α−1g(τ)dτ.

(3)

So we have

(3.7) Jα(f g)(t) +f(ρ)g(ρ)Jα(1)≥g(ρ)Jα(f)(t) +f(ρ)Jα(g)(t).

Multiplying both sides of (3.7) by (t−ρ)Γ(α)α−1, ρ∈(0, t),we obtain:

(3.8) (t−ρ)α−1

Γ (α) Jα(f g)(t) + (t−ρ)α−1

Γ (α) f(ρ)g(ρ)Jα(1)

≥ (t−ρ)α−1

Γ (α) g(ρ)Jαf(t) + (t−ρ)α−1

Γ (α) f(ρ)Jαg(t).

Now integrating (3.8) over(0, t),we get:

(3.9) Jα(f g)(t) Z t

0

(t−ρ)α−1

Γ(α) dρ+Jα(1) Γ(α)

Z t

0

f(ρ)g(ρ)(t−ρ)α−1

≥ Jαf(t) Γ(α)

Z t

0

(t−ρ)α−1g(ρ)dρ+ Jαg(t) Γ(α)

Z t

0

(t−ρ)α−1f(ρ)dρ.

Hence

(3.10) Jα(f g)(t)≥ 1

Jα(1)Jαf(t)Jαg(t),

and this ends the proof.

The second result is:

Theorem 3.2. Let f andg be two synchronous functions on [0,∞[. Then for allt > 0, α >

0, β >0,we have:

(3.11) tα

Γ (α+ 1)Jβ(f g)(t) + tβ

Γ (β+ 1)Jα(f g)(t)≥Jαf(t)Jβg(t) +Jβf(t)Jαg(t).

Proof. Using similar arguments as in the proof of Theorem 3.1, we can write

(3.12) (t−ρ)β−1

Γ (β) Jα(f g) (t) +Jα(1)(t−ρ)β−1

Γ (β) f(ρ)g(ρ)

≥ (t−ρ)β−1

Γ (β) g(ρ)Jαf(t) + (t−ρ)β−1

Γ (β) f(ρ)Jαg(t). By integrating (3.12) over(0, t),we obtain

(3.13) Jα(f g)(t) Z t

0

(t−ρ)β−1

Γ (β) dρ+Jα(1) Γ (β)

Z t

0

f(ρ)g(ρ) (t−ρ)β−1

≥ Jαf(t) Γ (β)

Z t

0

(t−ρ)β−1g(ρ)dρ+Jαg(t) Γ (β)

Z t

0

(t−ρ)β−1f(ρ)dρ,

and this ends the proof.

Remark 1. The inequalities (3.1) and (3.11) are reversed if the functions are asynchronous on [0,∞[(i.e.(f(x)−f(y))(g(x)−g(y))≤0,for anyx, y ∈[0,∞[).

Remark 2. Applying Theorem 3.2 forα=β,we obtain Theorem 3.1.

The third result is:

(4)

Theorem 3.3. Let (fi)i=1,...,n be n positive increasing functions on [0,∞[. Then for any t >

0, α >0,we have

(3.14) Jα

n

Y

i=1

fi

!

(t)≥(Jα(1))1−n

n

Y

i=1

Jαfi(t).

Proof. We prove this theorem by induction.

Clearly, forn= 1,we haveJα(f1) (t)≥Jα(f1) (t),for allt >0, α >0.

Forn = 2,applying (3.1), we obtain:

Jα(f1f2) (t)≥(Jα(1))−1Jα(f1) (t)Jα(f2) (t), for allt >0, α >0.

Now, suppose that (induction hypothesis)

(3.15) Jα

n−1

Y

i=1

fi

!

(t)≥(Jα(1))2−n

n−1

Y

i=1

Jαfi(t), t >0, α >0.

Since(fi)i=1,...,n are positive increasing functions, then Qn−1 i=1 fi

(t)is an increasing function.

Hence we can apply Theorem 3.1 to the functionsQn−1

i=1 fi =g, fn=f.We obtain:

(3.16) Jα

n

Y

i=1

fi

!

(t) = Jα(f g) (t)≥(Jα(1))−1Jα

n−1

Y

i=1

fi

!

(t)Jα(fn) (t).

Taking into account the hypothesis (3.15), we obtain:

(3.17) Jα

n

Y

i=1

fi

!

(t)≥(Jα(1))−1((Jα(1))2−n

n−1

Y

i=1

Jαfi

!

(t))Jα(fn) (t),

and this ends the proof.

We further have:

Theorem 3.4. Letf andg be two functions defined on[0,+∞[,such thatf is increasing,gis differentiable and there exists a real numberm:= inft≥0g0(t).Then the inequality

(3.18) Jα(f g)(t)≥(Jα(1))−1Jαf(t)Jαg(t)− mt

α+ 1Jαf(t) +mJα(tf(t)) is valid for allt >0, α >0.

Proof. We consider the functionh(t) := g(t)−mt.It is clear thathis differentiable and it is increasing on[0,+∞[. Then using Theorem 3.1, we can write:

Jα

(g−mt)f(t)

≥(Jα(1))−1Jαf(t)

Jαg(t)−mJα(t) (3.19)

≥(Jα(1))−1Jαf(t)Jαg(t)− m(Jα(1))−1tα+1

Γ (α+ 2) Jαf(t)

≥(Jα(1))−1Jαf(t)Jαg(t)− mΓ (α+ 1)t

Γ (α+ 2) Jαf(t)

≥(Jα(1))−1Jαf(t)Jαg(t)− mt

α+ 1Jαf(t).

Hence

(3.20) Jα(f g)(t)≥(Jα(1))−1Jαf(t)Jαg(t)− mt

α+ 1Jαf(t) +mJα(tf(t)), t >0, α >0.

Theorem 3.4 is thus proved.

(5)

Corollary 3.5. Letf andg be two functions defined on[0,+∞[.

(A) Suppose that f is decreasing,g is differentiable and there exists a real numberM :=

supt≥0g0(t). Then for allt >0,α >0, we have:

(3.21) Jα(f g)(t)≥(Jα(1))−1Jαf(t)Jαg(t)− M t

α+ 1Jαf(t) +M Jα(tf(t)).

(B) Suppose that f and g are differentiable and there exist m1 := inft≥0f0(x), m2 :=

inft≥0g0(t). Then we have

(3.22) Jα(f g)(t)−m1Jαtg(t)−m2Jαtf(t) +m1m2Jαt2

≥(Jα(1))−1

Jαf(t)Jαg(t)−m1JαtJαg(t)−m2JαtJαf(t) +m1m2(Jαt)2 . (C) Suppose that f and g are differentiable and there exist M1 := supt≥0f0(t), M2 :=

supt≥0g0(t).Then the inequality

(3.23) Jα(f g)(t)−M1Jαtg(t)−M2Jαtf(t) +M1M2Jαt2

≥(Jα(1))−1

Jαf(t)Jαg(t)−M1JαtJαg(t)−M2JαtJαf(t) +M1M2(Jαt)2 .

is valid.

Proof.

(A): Apply Theorem 3.1 to the functionsf andG(t) := g(t)−m2t.

(B): Apply Theorem 3.1 to the functions F and G, where: F(t) := f(t)− m1t, G(t) :=

g(t)−m2t.

To prove(C),we apply Theorem 3.1 to the functions

F(t) :=f(t)−M1t, G(t) :=g(t)−M2t.

REFERENCES

[1] P.L. CHEBYSHEV, Sur les expressions approximatives des integrales definies par les autres prises entre les mêmes limites, Proc. Math. Soc. Charkov, 2 (1882), 93–98.

[2] R. GORENFLO ANDF. MAINARDI, Fractional Calculus: Integral and Differential Equations of Fractional Order, Springer Verlag, Wien (1997), 223–276.

[3] S.M. MALAMUD, Some complements to the Jenson and Chebyshev inequalities and a problem of W. Walter, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 129(9) (2001), 2671–2678.

[4] S. MARINKOVIC, P. RAJKOVIC AND M. STANKOVIC, The inequalities for some types q- integrals, Comput. Math. Appl., 56 (2008), 2490–2498.

[5] B.G. PACHPATTE, A note on Chebyshev-Grüss type inequalities for differential functions, Tamsui Oxford Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 22(1) (2006), 29–36.

[6] I. PODLUBNI, Fractional Differential Equations, Academic Press, San Diego, 1999.

Hivatkozások

KAPCSOLÓDÓ DOKUMENTUMOK

In this paper we establish some new weighted multidimensional Grüss type integral and discrete inequalities by using a fairly elementary analysis.. 2000 Mathematics

In this paper, we give new inequalities involving some special (resp. q-special) functions, using their integral (resp. q-integral) representations and a technique developed by

In this paper, we establish some Hermite- Hadamard type inequalities involving two log-preinvex functions using essentially the technique of Pachpatte [11, 12].. This is the

In a recent paper, Noor [8] has obtained the following analogous Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for the preinvex and log-preinvex func- tions.. Theorem

In this paper we establish new inequalities similar to the ˇCebyšev integral in- equality involving functions and their derivatives via certain Trapezoidal like rules.. 2000

In this paper we establish new inequalities similar to the ˇ Cebyšev integral inequal- ity involving functions and their derivatives via certain Trapezoidal like rules.. Key words

In the present paper we establish some integral inequalities analogous to the well- known Hadamard inequality for a class of generalized weighted quasi-arithmetic means in inte-

B.G. In this paper we establish new Ostrowski type inequalities involving product of two functions. The analysis used in the proofs is elementary and based on the use of the